What kind of love do you have?
Explore the three ingredients of lasting love, and see how they show up in your relationship right now.
8 questions4 minFree, no sign-up
- Companionate love
- Romantic love
- Companionate commitment
Three ingredients, not one feeling
Robert Sternberg’s triangular theory makes one useful move: it stops treating love as a single quantity you either have or do not have, and splits it into three.
- Intimacy is closeness and knowing. Can you say the awkward thing out loud? Do they know what your week has actually been like?
- Passion is desire and charge. Physical attraction, but also the pull toward each other, the wanting.
- Commitment is the decision to stay and to keep choosing it. Less felt than the other two, and often the quietest.
Different combinations get different names. All three is consummate love. Intimacy plus commitment without much passion is companionate love, which describes a great many long, happy marriages. Passion plus intimacy without commitment is romantic love. The point of naming them is not to score your relationship but to see which ingredient has gone quiet, because each one is rebuilt differently.
The three move at different speeds
This is the part worth knowing before you read your result. Passion tends to peak early and settle. That decline is the most-documented and least-alarming finding in the whole area, and couples who expect it read it very differently from couples who take it as evidence something is wrong. Intimacy builds slowly and can keep building for decades. Commitment tends to be flat and then step-change, usually around a decision.
So a relationship that scores lower on passion at year eight than year one is not failing. It is behaving normally. What actually predicts trouble is intimacy dropping, because that is the ingredient that keeps the other two repairable.
Rebuilding the one that has gone quiet
Each ingredient responds to different things, which is why generic advice so often misses.
- Low intimacy responds to disclosure and to attention. Not big talks, mostly. Asking a real question and staying for the answer.
- Low passion responds to novelty, physical closeness that is not a prelude to anything, and to having enough intimacy that desire feels safe. It rarely responds to pressure.
- Low commitment responds to honesty about where you both actually are, which is uncomfortable and usually more useful than a grand gesture.
If the passion answer is where yours landed, rebuilding intimacy after a rough patch covers the slower version of this. If everything is fine but flat, small daily habits that keep couples close is the more practical starting point.
Reading your result honestly
Take it separately from your partner and compare, rather than answering together. Where you disagree about how much intimacy there currently is, that gap is the actual conversation. One of you is experiencing a relationship the other does not know they are in.
This is a reflective tool, not a clinical assessment or a prediction about whether you will last. If you are weighing a hard decision about the relationship, that deserves a real therapist rather than a quiz.
More quizzes like this
- What’s your attachment style? Discover how you seek closeness, handle distance, and what would help you feel more secure.
- What’s your love language? Find out which expressions of care mean the most to you, and what you most need from a partner.
- Do you turn toward each other? See how you answer the small, everyday reaches for attention, and how you make your own.
- Is your desire spontaneous or responsive? Find out how wanting tends to start for you, what switches it on, and what quietly switches it off.
Adapted from Robert Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love
This is a reflective tool, not a clinical diagnosis or a substitute for therapy. If things feel heavy, find real support here.
The next quiet evening is coming.
You need somewhere to say the true thing tonight, and someone on the other end who knows the story.
No card to start · your partner doesn’t have to be ready